72,000+
Documents indexed
Contracts, specifications, drawings, submittals, letters and reports — one live project's archive, searchable to the page.
5,300+
Sign-offs carried
Deliverable rows moved through real approval chains — originate, discipline check, approve, DC check, issue.
14
Engineers in parallel
Working the same registers and the same chains at once, reconciled without a single lost revision.
EN + AR
Both languages, scanned
Stamped drawings and scanned Arabic letters read by OCR and searched alongside native text.
Every feature has a scar behind it
The follow-up engine exists because replies went missing. The claims ledger exists because entitlement had to be reconstructed from twelve folders at the worst possible moment. The scope screen exists because a consultant comment quietly added work that nobody registered. Nothing in this workspace was invented to fill a feature grid — each part was written the week its absence cost something real.
Written by a practising MEP manager, on a live delivery — not by a team who read about one
Every workflow shape in the product is a shape that had to survive an actual submission
The capacities quoted here are measured on that project, not extrapolated from a benchmark
The deliverable list that carried the sign-offs — day after day.
The archive
Ask a 72,000-document archive and get the page
Indexing, OCR and retrieval tuned against a real mixed archive — native PDFs, scanned
transmittals, stamped drawing sheets, Arabic correspondence. Answers cite the document, the
revision and the page, so an engineer can check the source in one click rather than trust a summary.
The chains
Approval workflows that survived audit
Named steps, named owners, working-day clocks and a full revision history per deliverable —
including who acted for whom, and when. Reconstructing "what happened on P02" takes seconds,
because the record was written as the work happened.
The correspondence
Nothing waits in silence
Incoming mail tracked to the project, follow-ups chased on their own clocks, escalations
raised before a reply becomes a delay event. The chase list is generated, not remembered.
The evidence
Claims built from the record you already keep
Held-versus-allowed clocks, notice windows and excess days come out of the registers
themselves — every exhibit carrying its document references, dates and page citations.
The hardware
It ran on infrastructure the project owned
The whole workspace — index, documents, workflows, AI routing — running on hardware inside
the team's own control, reachable securely from anywhere, with nothing sitting in someone else's
multi-tenant cloud.
Project names, employers, consultants and document numbers are withheld and every screenshot on this site uses a fictional demonstration project. Client confidentiality is not negotiable — the same discipline applies to your data when you run the workspace.
Prove it on your own project.
Fifteen days, the full product, inside a realistic demo project.