Engineering Workspace / Proven in delivery
Built in delivery, not in a demo lab

It was proven before it was sold.

Engineering Workspace was not designed as a product and then looked for a project. It was written inside the delivery of a live mega-project by the engineer running that delivery, on the days the problems appeared — and it has carried that project's documents, workflows and correspondence every working day since.

72,000+
Documents indexed
Contracts, specifications, drawings, submittals, letters and reports — one live project's archive, searchable to the page.
5,300+
Sign-offs carried
Deliverable rows moved through real approval chains — originate, discipline check, approve, DC check, issue.
14
Engineers in parallel
Working the same registers and the same chains at once, reconciled without a single lost revision.
EN + AR
Both languages, scanned
Stamped drawings and scanned Arabic letters read by OCR and searched alongside native text.
1:19 · WATCHWhere your data lives: your server, your record
The ownership film: your server, your record, your data staying home.
No mystery numbers

How each figure was measured.

Every number on this site is a reading from one live workspace, not a projection. Here is exactly where each one comes from, so you can ask us to show you the same reading live.

72,000+ documents indexedThe document count of the project knowledge base, read from the workspace's own index health panel. It includes specifications, drawings, correspondence and scanned letters, English and Arabic, OCRed and searchable to the page.
5,300+ sign-offs carriedThe count of deliverable revisions moved through originate, check, approve, document control and issue chains on the live engineering deliverables list, read from the workflow record.
14 engineers in parallelDistinct user accounts acting on the same registers and chains inside the same working weeks, read from the audit trail.
40 calculatorsCount them on the calculators page; each carries its formula and assumptions.

These are first-party readings from a confidential project record, so the record itself is not public. On a serious evaluation we will happily show the readings live on a screen share, or under NDA.

Every feature has a scar behind it

The follow-up engine exists because replies went missing. The claims ledger exists because entitlement had to be reconstructed from twelve folders at the worst possible moment. The scope screen exists because a consultant comment quietly added work that nobody registered. Nothing in this workspace was invented to fill a feature grid — each part was written the week its absence cost something real.

Written by a practising MEP manager, on a live delivery — not by a team who read about one
Every workflow shape in the product is a shape that had to survive an actual submission
The capacities quoted here are measured on that project, not extrapolated from a benchmark
The deliverables list in daily use
The deliverable list that carried the sign-offs — day after day.
The archive
Ask a 72,000-document archive and get the page Indexing, OCR and retrieval tuned against a real mixed archive — native PDFs, scanned transmittals, stamped drawing sheets, Arabic correspondence. Answers cite the document, the revision and the page, so an engineer can check the source in one click rather than trust a summary.
The chains
Approval workflows that survived audit Named steps, named owners, working-day clocks and a full revision history per deliverable — including who acted for whom, and when. Reconstructing "what happened on P02" takes seconds, because the record was written as the work happened.
The correspondence
Nothing waits in silence Incoming mail tracked to the project, follow-ups chased on their own clocks, escalations raised before a reply becomes a delay event. The chase list is generated, not remembered.
The evidence
Claims built from the record you already keep Held-versus-allowed clocks, notice windows and excess days come out of the registers themselves — every exhibit carrying its document references, dates and page citations.
The hardware
It ran on infrastructure the project owned The whole workspace — index, documents, workflows, AI routing — running on hardware inside the team's own control, reachable securely from anywhere, with nothing sitting in someone else's multi-tenant cloud.

Project names, employers, consultants and document numbers are withheld and every screenshot on this site uses a fictional demonstration project. Client confidentiality is not negotiable — the same discipline applies to your data when you run the workspace.

Prove it on your own project.

Fourteen days, the full product, on your own machine.
Download and install →
← Platform & AdministrationBack to the overview →